David Joyner v. State
This text of David Joyner v. State (David Joyner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-355-CV
DAVID JOYNER APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
Appellant David Joyner is attempting to appeal from the trial court=s denial of his pretrial motion to recuse. An interlocutory order denying a motion to recuse is not appealable. Means v. State, 825 S.W.2d 260, 260B61 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.CDallas 1998, no pet.); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1996, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 14, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Joyner v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-joyner-v-state-texapp-2010.