David Joyner v. State

Opinion

                                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

                                        NO. 2-09-355-CV

DAVID JOYNER                                                                   APPELLANT

                                                   V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

                                              ------------

             FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

                                              ------------

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1]

                                              ------------

Appellant David Joyner is attempting to appeal from the trial court=s denial of his pretrial motion to recuse.  An interlocutory order denying a motion to recuse is not appealable.  Means v. State, 825 S.W.2d 260, 260B61 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.CDallas 1998, no pet.); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1996, no pet.).  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  January 14, 2010

---

^[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.