Meagher v. Hayes

25 N.E. 105, 152 Mass. 228, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 48
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 25 N.E. 105 (Meagher v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meagher v. Hayes, 25 N.E. 105, 152 Mass. 228, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 48 (Mass. 1890).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

The building put upon the land by the consent of the mortgagor, and without the consent of the mortgagee, was clearly, as regards him and the mortgagee, a part of the [230]*230realty, and covered by tbe mortgage. Butler v. Page, 7 Met. 40. Cole v. Stewart, 11 Cusb. 181. Guernsey v. Wilson, 134 Mass. 482. The foreclosure of the mortgage was by sale, and the right of the mortgagee to sell the building as part of the mortgaged property could not be affected by agreements in regard to it to which he was not a party, nor by notice of the claims of the defendants given to one who buys the house at the sale. Clary v. Owen, 15 Gray, 522. Hunt v. Bay State Iron Co. 97 Mass. 279. Southbridge Savings Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass. 542. Decree affirmed.

Memorandum.

On the seventeenth day of September, 1890, James M. MorTON, Esquire, of Fall River, was appointed a Justice of this court in place of Mr. Justice Field, appointed Chief Justice, and tool his seat upon the bench on the twenty-third day of the same month, at the term of this court then held at Boston for the county of Suffolk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Reese
194 B.R. 782 (D. Maryland, 1996)
Miller v. Monroe County
31 Pa. D. & C.2d 203 (Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, 1962)
Penn-Lehigh Corp. Appeal
159 A.2d 56 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Schnebbe Fire Protection Engineering Corp. v. Sandt Estate
74 A.2d 104 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Smith v. Bush
1935 OK 331 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Vorsec Co. v. Gilkey
170 A. 722 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1934)
Holland Furnace Co. v. Bird
21 P.2d 825 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1933)
Burbridge v. Therrell
148 So. 204 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Clayton v. Lienhard
167 A. 321 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Mallory v. Agee
147 So. 881 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Menard v. Courchaine
179 N.E. 167 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Bankers' & Merchants' Credit Co. v. Harlem Park Building & Loan Ass'n
153 A. 64 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1931)
Federal Trust Co. v. Bristol County Street Railway Co.
222 Mass. 35 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Perley v. City of Cambridge
220 Mass. 507 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Hukill
85 A. 60 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1912)
Tippett v. Barham
180 F. 76 (Fourth Circuit, 1910)
Young v. Chandler
66 A. 539 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1906)
Lorain Steel Co. v. Norfolk & Bristol Street Railway Co.
73 N.E. 646 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
McMillan v. Leaman
101 A.D. 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
McCrillis v. Cole
55 A. 196 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 N.E. 105, 152 Mass. 228, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meagher-v-hayes-mass-1890.