Guernsey v. Wilson

134 Mass. 482, 1883 Mass. LEXIS 336
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 3, 1883·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Holmes, J.

The defendant" in this case was the former owner of certain land subject to a mortgage. The mortgage was foreclosed with his knowledge. He remained in occupation of the land, and, without any contract or consent on the part of the owner, put up a house and part of a barn upon it. The female [484]*484plaintiff then bought the land, and now seeks to enjoin the defendant from removing the structures.

When the buildings were attached to the realty, they became part of it, and the defendant does not bring himself within the rules that authorize a severance, even as against the owners at that time. Sudbury Parish v. Jones, 8 Cush. 184, 190. Oakman v. Dorchester Ins. Co. 98 Mass. 57. Madigan v. McCarthy, 108 Mass. 376, 377. The plaintiff seems to have the additional circumstance in her favor, that she is a purchaser without notice. Gibbs v. Estey, 15 Gray, 587. Madigan v. McCarthy, ubi supra. At all events, she has a perfect title; and no reason is disclosed why equity should not protect her from irreparable damage.

Decree for the plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guernsey v. Wilson, 134 Mass. 482, 1883 Mass. LEXIS 336 (Mass. 1883).

134 Mass. 482 (Guernsey v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Menard v. Courchaine
179 N.E. 167 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Barnes v. Hosmer
82 N.E. 27 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Meagher v. Hayes
25 N.E. 105 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)