McNewis Executors v. Rogers
This text of 1 Thompson 56 (McNewis Executors v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There are but two cases in which this Court can correct its judgments at a term subsequent to their rendition ; one at common law where the entry was a misprision of the clerk ; the other under Mr. Nicholson’s law to authorize the Supreme Court to do justice in certain cases, and this ease does not fall within either (2)
Power of Supreme Court over its judgment of former term. — Bill of Review does not lie to revise, Cox v. Breedlove, 2 Yerg. 499; Wilson v. Wilson, 10 Yerg. 200. But may correct errors arising from misprision of Clerk, Crutchfield v. Stewart, 1 Humph. 380; Farris v. Kilpatrick, 1 Humph. 379. Contra, where the error proceeds from an arrangement of the parties. Ridgeway v. Ward. 4 Humph. 430. See Witt v. Griggsby Infra. See the Code 2877, 2878, 2879. See also Ballen v. Farnsworth, Infra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Thompson 56, 1 Shan. Cas. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnewis-executors-v-rogers-tenn-1850.