McLeod v. State

583 So. 2d 818, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8406, 1991 WL 158229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McLeod v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 586 So. 2d 1351
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 1991·No. No. 90-1233·Published

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

Appellant appeals his enhanced sentence pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, arguing that the trial court erred in classifying him as a habitual offender based on five prior convictions rendered on the same date. In light of this court’s recent holding in Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), that habitual offender classification must be based on sequential convictions, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

As this court did in Barnes, we certify the following as a question of great public importance:

WHETHER SECTION 775.084(l)(a)(l), FLORIDA STATUTES (Supp.1988), WHICH DEFINES HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDERS AS THOSE WHO HAVE “PREVIOUSLY BEEN CONVICTED OF TWO OR MORE FELONIES,” REQUIRES THAT EACH OF THE FELONIES BE COMMITTED AFTER CONVICTION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PREVIOUS OFFENSE?

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ZEHMER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. State, 583 So. 2d 818, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8406, 1991 WL 158229 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 818 (McLeod v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. State
576 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)