McLeod v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McLeod v. State

564 So. 2d 249, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197, 1990 WL 98760

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 19, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1858

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 249 (McLeod v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLeod v. State, 564 So. 2d 249, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197, 1990 WL 98760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant had pleaded guilty to attempted sexual battery and was placed on five years probation. At the hearing to sentence him for violation of probation, appellant objected to the scoring of points for “penetration or slight injury” based (as best we can tell) on the “element of the offense” issue which is no longer a requirement of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(7). No issue was raised below concerning the quality of the state’s proof concerning “penetration or slight injury”; however, this issue has now been raised on appeal and has merit. Because the record below is somewhat unclear, we remand this matter to the trial court for an evidentary hearing on the proper scoring of victim injury.

REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DANIEL, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant had pleaded guilty to attempted sexual battery and was placed on five years probation. At the hearing to sentence him for violation of probation, appellant objected to the scoring of points for “penetration or slight injury” based (as best we can tell) on the “element of the offense” issue which is no longer a requirement of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(7). No issue was raised below concerning the quality of the state’s proof concerning “penetration or slight injury”; however, this issue has now been raised on appeal and has merit. Because the record below is somewhat unclear, we remand this matter to the trial court for an evidentary hearing on the proper scoring of victim injury.

REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DANIEL, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 249, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197, 1990 WL 98760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcleod-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.