McLeod v. State

549 So. 2d 255, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2266, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5294, 1989 WL 111531
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 1989·No. No. 89-349·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DANIEL, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Charles Lucian McLeod, appeals his conviction and sentence for cultivation of marijuana and possession of marijuana.

We find McLeod’s appeal without merit, but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected judgment. The defendant was charged in count II of the information with possession of marijuana under section 893.13(l)(f), a third degree felony and section 893.13(l)(g), a misdemeanor. The judgment reads that the defendant was convicted of “section 893.13(l)(f), a misdemeanor.” This was evidently a typographical error. There is no evidence in the record of the amount of marijuana the defendant had in his possession. The judgment should read “section 893.13(l)(g), a misdemeanor.”

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment.

COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLeod v. State, 549 So. 2d 255, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2266, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5294, 1989 WL 111531 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

549 So. 2d 255 (McLeod v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Piediscalzo v. State
549 So. 2d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)