McKinney v. Parsons
423 U.S. 960
Opinions
-C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in previous opinions by himself1 and by [961]*961Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state ban on, or regulation of, obscenity abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKinney v. Parsons, 423 U.S. 960 (1975).
423 U.S. 960 (McKinney v. Parsons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chambers v. State
364 So. 2d 416 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
United States Ex Rel. Means v. Solem
457 F. Supp. 1256 (D. South Dakota, 1978)
Robinson v. Parsons
560 F.2d 720 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
People v. Bratis
73 Cal. App. 3d 751 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
McKinney v. Parsons
423 U.S. 960 (Supreme Court, 1975)