Court v. Wisconsin

413 U.S. 911, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1023, 93 S. Ct. 3032, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1945

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Wis. Reported below: 51 Wis. 2d 683, 188 N. W. 2d 475;

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Orange;

Ct. App. Md. Reported below: 263 Md. 76, 282 A. 2d 126;

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Reported below: See 26 Ohio App. 2d 183, 271 N. E. 2d 13;

Ct. App. Ky.;

C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 449 F. 2d 787;

Sup. Ct. Ind. Reported below: 257 Ind. 204, 273 N. E. 2d 842;

Sup. Ct. Ind. Reported below: 257 Ind. 394, 276 N. E. 2d 517;

No. 71-1368. No. 71-1458. No. 71-1464. No. 71-1587. No. 71-1641. No. 71-1674. No. 71-1702. No. 72-124. No. 72-172. No. 72-357. No. 72-538. No. 72-539. No. 72-558. No. 72-569. No. 72-591. No. 72-859.

C. A. 4th Cir.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.;

Ct. App. Ky. Reported below: 475 S. W. 2d 893;

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles;

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Sacramento. Reported below: 25 Cal. App. 3d Supp. 24, 101 Cal. Rptr. 726;

Sup. Ct. Minn. Reported below: 293 Minn. 11, 195 N. W. 2d 827;

App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept.;

Sup. Ct. Ill. Reported below: 51 Ill. 2d 410, 282 N. E. 2d 691;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

Sup. Ct. Va. Reported below: 213 Va. 113, 189 S. E. 2d 324;

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Reported below: 31 Ohio St. 2d 27, 285 N. E. 2d 327;

Ct. App. Ohio, Summit County;

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of San Francisco;

Sup. Ct. Va.;

App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d & 11th Jud. Dists.;

No. 72-872. No. 72-918. No. 72-961. No. 72-994. No. 72-1062. No. 72-1071. No. 72-1072. No. 72-1221. No. 72-1330.

C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 469 F. 2d 752;

Super. Ct. N. J.;

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of San Bernardino;

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Santa Cruz;

Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 270 So. 2d 547; and

Ct. App. N. C. Reported below: 16 N. C. App. 456, 192 S. E. 2d 693.