MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Township of West Orange

19 N.J. Tax 114
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJune 27, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 19 N.J. Tax 114 (MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Township of West Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Township of West Orange, 19 N.J. Tax 114 (N.J. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

MCI Telecommunications Corp. (MCI), appeals from the Tax Court’s determination that the “highest and best use” of its property at 271 Mt. Pleasant Avenue, West Orange, is “a special purpose telecommunication facility.” MCI had challenged the valuation of the property for the years 1995 and 1996. The matter was tried by Judge Roger M. Kahn.

On appeal, MCI contends that Judge Kahn erred: (1) by concluding that highest and best use of the property was that of a special purpose telecommunication facility; (2) by failing to consider MCI’s expert’s evaluation approach; and (8) by failing to consider functional obsolescence in applying the cost approach.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kahn in his October 27,1998 written opinion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Regent Care v. Hackensack City
27 N.J. Tax 138 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2013)
Westwood Lanes, Inc. v. Garwood Borough
24 N.J. Tax 239 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2008)
General Motors Corp. v. Linden City
22 N.J. Tax 95 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 N.J. Tax 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mci-telecommunications-corp-v-township-of-west-orange-njsuperctappdiv-2000.