McDonald v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McDonald v. State

65 S.W.3d 571, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 77, 2002 WL 77066

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 22, 2002

DocketNo. WD 59667

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.W.3d 571 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. State, 65 S.W.3d 571, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 77, 2002 WL 77066 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Candy McDonald was convicted of one count each of murder in the second-degree, § 565.021, RSMo 2000, and armed-criminal action, § 571.015. Under Rule 29.15, Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief asserting ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to properly cross-examine a State’s witness, and failure to interview and call two other witnesses. The motion court denied Appellant’s claims for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Candy McDonald was convicted of one count each of murder in the second-degree, § 565.021, RSMo 2000, and armed-criminal action, § 571.015. Under Rule 29.15, Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief asserting ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to properly cross-examine a State’s witness, and failure to interview and call two other witnesses. The motion court denied Appellant’s claims for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.W.3d 571, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 77, 2002 WL 77066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-state-moctapp-2002.