Collins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collins v. State

41 S.W.3d 49, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 565, 2001 WL 314898

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 3, 2001

DocketNo. ED 78544

StatusPublished

This text of 41 S.W.3d 49 (Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. State, 41 S.W.3d 49, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 565, 2001 WL 314898 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Collins (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Collins (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 S.W.3d 49, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 565, 2001 WL 314898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-state-moctapp-2001.