State v. Lee

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lee

941 S.W.2d 714, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, 1997 WL 104474

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 11, 1997

DocketNos. 69694, 71060

StatusPublished

This text of 941 S.W.2d 714 (State v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lee, 941 S.W.2d 714, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, 1997 WL 104474 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of stealing, third offense, § 570.040, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of eight years’ imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of stealing, third offense, § 570.040, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of eight years’ imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

941 S.W.2d 714, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, 1997 WL 104474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lee-moctapp-1997.