State v. McDonald

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McDonald

990 S.W.2d 670, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 459

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 6, 1999

DocketNo. 72343

StatusPublished

This text of 990 S.W.2d 670 (State v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McDonald, 990 S.W.2d 670, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 459 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Larry McDonald, appeals from his convictions for one count of second degree robbery, section 569.030, RSMo 1994, and one count of misdemeanor third degree assault, section 565.070, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Larry McDonald, appeals from his convictions for one count of second degree robbery, section 569.030, RSMo 1994, and one count of misdemeanor third degree assault, section 565.070, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

990 S.W.2d 670, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcdonald-moctapp-1999.