McCray v. State

762 So. 2d 1004, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8274, 2000 WL 873609
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 2000·No. No. 4D99-1034·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court sentenced appellant as a habitual felony offender, violent career criminal, and prison releasee reoffender. We remand for re-sentencing and instruct the trial court to sentence appellant under only one sentencing provision. Mendez v. State, 761 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Adams v. State, 750 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

We recognize that this decision conflicts with those of other districts, and, thus, certify conflict with Grant v. State, 745 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) rev. granted, 761 So.2d 329 (Fla.2000); Smith v. State, 754 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Alfonso v. State, 761 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

FARMER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCray v. State, 762 So. 2d 1004, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8274, 2000 WL 873609 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

762 So. 2d 1004 (McCray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
769 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)