McCray v. State

701 So. 2d 1266, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895, 1997 WL 757390
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1997·No. No. 97-2682·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Barnes v. State, 643 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 (“A motion to vacate a sentence that exceeds the limits provided by law may be filed at any time. [1267] No other motion shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 2 years after the judgment and sentence become final in a noncapital case ... unless it alleges that (1) the facts on which the claim is predicated were unknown to the movant or the movant’s attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence, or (2) the fundamental constitutional right asserted was not established within the period provided for herein and has been held to apply retroactively.” (emphasis added)).

In this case, the judgment and sentence became final twelve years ago, and neither exception to the time limit applies. Defendant’s -motion for postconviction relief was therefore untimely, and was properly denied.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCray v. State, 701 So. 2d 1266, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895, 1997 WL 757390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

701 So. 2d 1266 (McCray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
807 So. 2d 633 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Dedge v. State
723 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)