Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grant v. State

731 So. 2d 735, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4087, 1999 WL 173669

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1168

StatusPublished

This text of 731 So. 2d 735 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. State, 731 So. 2d 735, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4087, 1999 WL 173669 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994)(confessions of arrested accomplices admissible if truly self-inculpa-tory, rather than attempt to shift blame or curry favor); Franqui v. State, 699 So.2d [736]*7361312 (Fla.1997)(same); Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629 (Fla.1997)(setting forth circumstances in which non-testifying codefend-ant’s redacted confession is admissible with limiting jury instruction).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994)(confessions of arrested accomplices admissible if truly self-inculpa-tory, rather than attempt to shift blame or curry favor); Franqui v. State, 699 So.2d [736]*7361312 (Fla.1997)(same); Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629 (Fla.1997)(setting forth circumstances in which non-testifying codefend-ant’s redacted confession is admissible with limiting jury instruction).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

731 So. 2d 735, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4087, 1999 WL 173669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack