McCray v. State

671 So. 2d 246, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3728, 1996 WL 161303
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1996·No. No. 95-1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).' Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we vacate the lien for attorney fees imposed upon appellant because appellant was not afforded notice of intent to seek such a lien, or an opportunity to contest its amount. E.g., Bryant v. State, 661 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); L.A.D. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 268 (Fla.1993). On remand, a lien may again be impósed, provided that appellant is given notice and an opportunity to contest its amount.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCray v. State, 671 So. 2d 246, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3728, 1996 WL 161303 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

671 So. 2d 246 (McCray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paige v. State
675 So. 2d 637 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)