McCray v. State
This text of 633 So. 2d 561 (McCray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eldridge A. McCRAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Eldridge A. McCray, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court's summary denial of appellant's motion to correct his illegal sentence made pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The order of summary denial should have contained those portions of the record necessary to support the trial court's order. The state's supplementation of the order with portions of the record is insufficient to support the trial court's summary denial. See Kendall v. State, 619 So.2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) and McGrady v. State, 591 So.2d 270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with instructions to attach those portions of the record supporting its order.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DELL, C.J., and GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 So. 2d 561, 1994 WL 81786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccray-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.