McCray v. State
Opinion
Eldridge A. McCRAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Eldridge A. McCray, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court's summary denial of appellant's motion to correct his illegal sentence made pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The order of summary denial should have contained those portions of the record necessary to support the trial court's order. The state's supplementation of the order with portions of the record is insufficient to support the trial court's summary denial. See Kendall v. State, 619 So.2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) and McGrady v. State, 591 So.2d 270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with instructions to attach those portions of the record supporting its order.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DELL, C.J., and GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
633 So. 2d 561 (McCray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.