Hiler v. State
634 So. 2d 826, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3821, 1994 WL 138328
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1994·No. No. 94-0532·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse the order of the trial court which summarily denied appellant’s motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We remand for an evidentiary hearing, or for attachment to an order denying relief those portions of the record which refute appellant’s entitlement to relief. See Haggerty v. State, 632 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and McCray v. State, 633 So.2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hiler v. State, 634 So. 2d 826, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3821, 1994 WL 138328 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
634 So. 2d 826 (Hiler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McInnis v. State
643 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)