Hiler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hiler v. State

634 So. 2d 826, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3821, 1994 WL 138328

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 20, 1994

DocketNo. 94-0532

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 634 So. 2d 826 (Hiler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hiler v. State, 634 So. 2d 826, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3821, 1994 WL 138328 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court which summarily denied appellant’s motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We remand for an evidentiary hearing, or for attachment to an order denying relief those portions of the record which refute appellant’s entitlement to relief. See Haggerty v. State, 632 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and McCray v. State, 633 So.2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court which summarily denied appellant’s motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We remand for an evidentiary hearing, or for attachment to an order denying relief those portions of the record which refute appellant’s entitlement to relief. See Haggerty v. State, 632 So.2d 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and McCray v. State, 633 So.2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

634 So. 2d 826, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3821, 1994 WL 138328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiler-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack