Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McGrady v. State

McGrady v. State

591 So. 2d 270, 1991 WL 200136
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1991·No. 91-1377·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

591 So.2d 270 (1991)

John McGRADY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-1377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 9, 1991.

John McGrady, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for attachment to the order of denial of post-conviction relief those portions of the record relied on by the trial court for the summary denial. The rule requires their attachment, and our summary review procedures under Rule 9.140(g) depend on their inclusion. The supplementation of the order by one party in an appendix of portions of the record to a brief is insufficient to comply with the rules where the trial court summarily denied relief without a hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGrady v. State, 591 So. 2d 270, 1991 WL 200136 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

591 So. 2d 270 (McGrady v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cherry v. State
638 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Wheeler v. State
634 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
McCray v. State
633 So. 2d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Jackson v. State
602 So. 2d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)