McGrady v. State
This text of 591 So. 2d 270 (McGrady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John McGRADY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
John McGrady, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand for attachment to the order of denial of post-conviction relief those portions of the record relied on by the trial court for the summary denial. The rule requires their attachment, and our summary review procedures under Rule 9.140(g) depend on their inclusion. The supplementation of the order by one party in an appendix of portions of the record to a brief is insufficient to comply with the rules where the trial court summarily denied relief without a hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
591 So. 2d 270, 1991 WL 200136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgrady-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.