McCollum v. United States

Court of Claims

McCollum v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,472, 7 Cl. Ct. 709, 1985 U.S. Claims LEXIS 997

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 18, 1985

DocketNo. 346-82C

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,472 (McCollum v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCollum v. United States, 32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,472, 7 Cl. Ct. 709, 1985 U.S. Claims LEXIS 997 (cc 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

MAYER, Judge.

Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to amend order in light of J.F. Shea Co. v. United States, 754 F.2d 338 (Fed.Cir.1985), and defendant’s statement that Shea is controlling on the question of whether interest should be paid by the government at a variable or fixed rate in this case, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and that part of the opinion and order captioned Fixed Rate of Interest, 6 Cl.Ct. 373, 375-77, is VACATED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the rate of interest payable to plaintiff shall vary with the rates established at six month intervals by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Pub.L. No. 92-41 throughout the period of accrual. In all other respects the order of October 4, 1984, remanding the case to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals remains the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

MAYER, Judge.

Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to amend order in light of J.F. Shea Co. v. United States, 754 F.2d 338 (Fed.Cir.1985), and defendant’s statement that Shea is controlling on the question of whether interest should be paid by the government at a variable or fixed rate in this case, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and that part of the opinion and order captioned Fixed Rate of Interest, 6 Cl.Ct. 373, 375-77, is VACATED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the rate of interest payable to plaintiff shall vary with the rates established at six month intervals by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Pub.L. No. 92-41 throughout the period of accrual. In all other respects the order of October 4, 1984, remanding the case to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals remains the same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,472, 7 Cl. Ct. 709, 1985 U.S. Claims LEXIS 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccollum-v-united-states-cc-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack