McCollum v. State

641 So. 2d 507, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8456, 1994 WL 460252
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1994·No. No. 93-2837·Published

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences except for the order of restitution payable to Popeye’s Chicken located at 2143 Edgewood Avenue West. Appellant did not enter a plea to, nor was he otherwise convicted of, the charge of burglary against this establishment. Therefore, restitution for any losses incurred with respect thereto was improperly ordered. See In the Interest of F.P., 615 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); McBride v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); S.T.N. v. State, 474 So.2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The state concedes error on this point. Accordingly, we reverse this restitution order.

The remaining three restitution orders are affirmed. Nix v. State, 604 So.2d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCollum v. State, 641 So. 2d 507, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8456, 1994 WL 460252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

641 So. 2d 507 (McCollum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McBride v. State
617 So. 2d 405 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Nix v. State
604 So. 2d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
In the Interest of S.T.N. v. State
474 So. 2d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
In the Interest of F.P.
615 So. 2d 214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)