McCollum v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCollum v. State

641 So. 2d 507, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8456, 1994 WL 460252

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 26, 1994

DocketNo. 93-2837

StatusPublished

This text of 641 So. 2d 507 (McCollum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCollum v. State, 641 So. 2d 507, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8456, 1994 WL 460252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences except for the order of restitution payable to Popeye’s Chicken located at 2143 Edgewood Avenue West. Appellant did not enter a plea to, nor was he otherwise convicted of, the charge of burglary against this establishment. Therefore, restitution for any losses incurred with respect thereto was improperly ordered. See In the Interest of F.P., 615 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); McBride v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); S.T.N. v. State, 474 So.2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The state concedes error on this point. Accordingly, we reverse this restitution order.

The remaining three restitution orders are affirmed. Nix v. State, 604 So.2d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences except for the order of restitution payable to Popeye’s Chicken located at 2143 Edgewood Avenue West. Appellant did not enter a plea to, nor was he otherwise convicted of, the charge of burglary against this establishment. Therefore, restitution for any losses incurred with respect thereto was improperly ordered. See In the Interest of F.P., 615 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); McBride v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); S.T.N. v. State, 474 So.2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The state concedes error on this point. Accordingly, we reverse this restitution order.

The remaining three restitution orders are affirmed. Nix v. State, 604 So.2d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 So. 2d 507, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8456, 1994 WL 460252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccollum-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack