In the Interest of F.P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of F.P.

615 So. 2d 214, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1993 WL 55884

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 4, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1332

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 615 So. 2d 214 (In the Interest of F.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of F.P., 615 So. 2d 214, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1993 WL 55884 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges a restitution order, arguing that certain losses were not caused directly or indirectly by his offense of dealing in stolen property. The state concedes that the trial judge erred in ordering appellant to pay $730 in restitution. This amount represented losses caused by a burglary for which appellant was not charged. There is no evidence linking appellant to the actual burglary of the victim’s vehicle. There is also no evidence linking appellant to any of the items stolen during the burglary that were never recovered. We accordingly reverse the restitution order. Mansingh v. State, 588 So.2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). On remand, the trial judge may order restitution for the 11 compact discs related to the charged offense.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN, SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges a restitution order, arguing that certain losses were not caused directly or indirectly by his offense of dealing in stolen property. The state concedes that the trial judge erred in ordering appellant to pay $730 in restitution. This amount represented losses caused by a burglary for which appellant was not charged. There is no evidence linking appellant to the actual burglary of the victim’s vehicle. There is also no evidence linking appellant to any of the items stolen during the burglary that were never recovered. We accordingly reverse the restitution order. Mansingh v. State, 588 So.2d 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). On remand, the trial judge may order restitution for the 11 compact discs related to the charged offense.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN, SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 So. 2d 214, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1993 WL 55884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-fp-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack