McBride v. State
This text of 617 So. 2d 405 (McBride v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles McBRIDE, aPPELLANT,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
*406 PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence except for the order of restitution to the victim which we reverse. The defendant was found not guilty of the theft of the VCR for which restitution was ordered. Therefore, restitution for its loss is improper. See Simmons v. State, 484 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Furthermore, the trial court's oral sentence did not include a requirement of restitution although the written sentence did. However, the written order must conform to the oral pronouncement. Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for entry of order vacating order of restitution.
ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 So. 2d 405, 1993 WL 120382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbride-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.