Weiss v. State
670 So. 2d 1113, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3061, 1996 WL 135520
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1996·No. No. 95-3358·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction in all respects but note that the trial court orally “recommended” that appellant receive alcohol and substance abuse treatment. The trial court’s written order reflects that such treatment was “ordered.” As such, we remand with directions for the trial court to enter a written order conforming to its oral pronouncement. See McBride, v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weiss v. State, 670 So. 2d 1113, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3061, 1996 WL 135520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
670 So. 2d 1113 (Weiss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
670 So. 2d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)