Weiss v. State
This text of 670 So. 2d 1113 (Weiss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction in all respects but note that the trial court orally “recommended” that appellant receive alcohol and substance abuse treatment. The trial court’s written order reflects that such treatment was “ordered.” As such, we remand with directions for the trial court to enter a written order conforming to its oral pronouncement. See McBride, v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 So. 2d 1113, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3061, 1996 WL 135520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.