Weiss v. State

670 So. 2d 1113, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3061, 1996 WL 135520
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3358
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 670 So. 2d 1113 (Weiss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weiss v. State, 670 So. 2d 1113, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3061, 1996 WL 135520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction in all respects but note that the trial court orally “recommended” that appellant receive alcohol and substance abuse treatment. The trial court’s written order reflects that such treatment was “ordered.” As such, we remand with directions for the trial court to enter a written order conforming to its oral pronouncement. See McBride, v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
670 So. 2d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 So. 2d 1113, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3061, 1996 WL 135520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiss-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.