McCarthy v. Hawkins

391 F.3d 676
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 19, 2004·No. No. 03-50608·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

. Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for . Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in.regular active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. and 5th CiR. R. 35), The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy v. Hawkins, 391 F.3d 676 (5th Cir. 2004).

391 F.3d 676 (McCarthy v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCARTHY v. HAWKINS
391 F.3d 676 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)