McCall v. State
Opinion
Donald McCALL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Nancy Perez, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
*412 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence as a habitual offender. We reject appellant's contention that chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, amending section 775.084, Florida Statutes, violates the single subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. E.g., Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990).
HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
583 So. 2d 411 (McCall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.