Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crews v. State

603 So. 2d 690, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 1992 WL 201998

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 19, 1992

DocketNo. 91-03212

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 603 So. 2d 690 (Crews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crews v. State, 603 So. 2d 690, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 1992 WL 201998 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the Fourth District Court of Appeal that the 1989 amendments to the habitual offender statute were not invalid as violative of the one subject provision of the Florida Constitution. McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Contra, Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). That disposes of appellant’s first point.

Appellant’s only other point is that his classification as a habitual violent felony offender was a violation of due process and double jeopardy principles because the instant crime of which he was convicted (possession of a firearm by a convicted felon) was not a violent felony although several of his past felony convictions were for violent felonies. This issue has been decided contrary to appellant’s position in Ross v. State, 601 So.2d 1190 (Fla.1992).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI