Brayton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brayton v. State

605 So. 2d 138, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9317, 1992 WL 206412

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 28, 1992

DocketNo. 92-02579

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 605 So. 2d 138 (Brayton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brayton v. State, 605 So. 2d 138, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9317, 1992 WL 206412 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. All of appellant’s allegations are either facially insufficient or conclusively refuted by the portions of the record that the trial court attached to its order of denial. With respect to appellant’s allegation challenging the constitutionality of the habitual offender statute as violative of the single subject rule, see McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), rev. granted, 593 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1992).

LEHAN, C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. All of appellant’s allegations are either facially insufficient or conclusively refuted by the portions of the record that the trial court attached to its order of denial. With respect to appellant’s allegation challenging the constitutionality of the habitual offender statute as violative of the single subject rule, see McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), rev. granted, 593 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1992).

LEHAN, C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 So. 2d 138, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9317, 1992 WL 206412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brayton-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack