Mayfield v. Mayfield

929 So. 2d 671, 2006 WL 1359605
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 19, 2006
Docket5D05-4262
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 929 So. 2d 671 (Mayfield v. Mayfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So. 2d 671, 2006 WL 1359605 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

929 So.2d 671 (2006)

Lawrence E. MAYFIELD, Appellant,
v.
Angela MAYFIELD, Appellee.

No. 5D05-4262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 19, 2006.

*672 Lawrence E. Mayfield, New Smyrna Beach, Pro Se.

Angela Mayfield, Daytona Beach, Pro Se.

PER CURIAM.

The former husband, Lawrence E. Mayfield, appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage to his former wife, Angela Mayfield. Mr. Mayfield contends that the trial court erroneously valued the former wife and children's exclusive use of his non-marital home; miscalculated the amount of child support arrearages; and awarded inadequate visitation. We affirm.

Because no transcript exists of the proceedings, our review is limited to the pleadings, judgment dissolving the marriage and other matters contained in the record. As the appellant, Mr. Mayfield has the burden of demonstrating error. In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Neither has the former husband complied with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), which governs the preparation of a record when no transcript of the proceedings is available.

As the supreme court said in Applegate:

When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude *673 that the trial court so misconceived the law as to require a reversal.

377 So.2d at 1152.

Because no reversible error has been demonstrated from the record provided to us, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sasha Benlolo v. Judith Levy
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Nadia Kiswani v. Saleem Hafza
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Ivelisse Gragg-Rivera v. Ian S. Gragg
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Adolf Gaspard v. Fania Innocent
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
THOMAS FUHRMAN v. SARA G 01, LLC, etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Bass v. Bass
257 So. 3d 1225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Tramble v. Tramble
193 So. 3d 1105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Snyder v. Snyder
148 So. 3d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Fay v. Craig
99 So. 3d 981 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Brozik v. Walters
97 So. 3d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Jones v. Jones
68 So. 3d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Haddad v. Khan
54 So. 3d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Engesser v. Engesser
42 So. 3d 249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Livingston v. Guido
39 So. 3d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Schmidt v. Schmidt
997 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
A.L. v. Department of Children & Families
958 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Klinka v. Klinka
959 So. 2d 383 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Adams v. Zarate
955 So. 2d 49 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Marshall v. Marshall
953 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Murphy v. Murphy
948 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 671, 2006 WL 1359605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-mayfield-fladistctapp-2006.