Haddad v. Khan
This text of 54 So. 3d 524 (Haddad v. Khan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The former husband, Samir Haddad, appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage to his former wife, Yasmin Khan. [525]*525Haddad has raised eight issues on appeal. We affirm.
Because Haddad has not provided us with a transcript of the proceedings, our review is limited to the pleadings, the judgment dissolving the marriage and other matters contained in the record. As the appellant, Haddad has the burden of demonstrating error. “In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed.” See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671, 672-73 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Nor has Haddad complied with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), which governs the preparation of a record when no transcript of the proceedings is available.
Because no reversible error has been demonstrated from the record provided to us, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 So. 3d 524, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19838, 2010 WL 5348273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haddad-v-khan-fladistctapp-2010.