Brozik v. Walters

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brozik v. Walters

97 So. 3d 340, 2012 WL 4208306, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15889

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 21, 2012

DocketNo. 5D12-272

StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 3d 340 (Brozik v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brozik v. Walters, 97 So. 3d 340, 2012 WL 4208306, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15889 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frank W. Brozik, IV appeals a post-judgment order of civil contempt. Mr. Brozik has failed to provide a transcript of the final hearing or a statement of the evidence or the proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Without an adequate record, and because there is no error apparent on the face of the order itself, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not [sic] properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); see Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671, 672-73 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Frank W. Brozik, IV appeals a post-judgment order of civil contempt. Mr. Brozik has failed to provide a transcript of the final hearing or a statement of the evidence or the proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Without an adequate record, and because there is no error apparent on the face of the order itself, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not [sic] properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); see Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671, 672-73 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 3d 340, 2012 WL 4208306, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brozik-v-walters-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack