Matter of Rudey v. Landmarks Pres. Comm'n of the City of New York
This text of 627 N.E.2d 508 (Matter of Rudey v. Landmarks Pres. Comm'n of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. It was arbitrary and capricious in the circumstances presented for the Landmarks Preservation Commission to differentiate between two residents in the *835 same building in setting the timetable for replacement of nonconforming windows in both units.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Levine. Taking no part: Judge Smith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
627 N.E.2d 508, 82 N.Y.2d 832, 606 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 4319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rudey-v-landmarks-pres-commn-of-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1993.