Matter of Rudey v. Landmarks Pres. Comm'n of the City of New York

627 N.E.2d 508, 82 N.Y.2d 832, 606 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 4319
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 22, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 627 N.E.2d 508 (Matter of Rudey v. Landmarks Pres. Comm'n of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Rudey v. Landmarks Pres. Comm'n of the City of New York, 627 N.E.2d 508, 82 N.Y.2d 832, 606 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 4319 (N.Y. 1993).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. It was arbitrary and capricious in the circumstances presented for the Landmarks Preservation Commission to differentiate between two residents in the *835 same building in setting the timetable for replacement of nonconforming windows in both units.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Levine. Taking no part: Judge Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Delaware County Department of Social Services v. Pontonero
31 A.D.3d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Rudey v. Brown, Harris, Steven, Inc.
254 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
627 N.E.2d 508, 82 N.Y.2d 832, 606 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 4319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rudey-v-landmarks-pres-commn-of-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1993.