MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie

434 N.E.2d 714, 55 N.Y.2d 1019, 449 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3184
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 25, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 434 N.E.2d 714 (MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie, 434 N.E.2d 714, 55 N.Y.2d 1019, 449 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3184 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division except insofar as it discusses a right to a hearing because of injury to petitioner’s reputation. Inasmuch as that issue was not raised in the petition, it need not be reached here (cf. Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 NY2d 860).

In addition, we note that the respondents’ determination to disqualify petitioner was neither without factual basis nor was it arbitrary or capricious.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attard v. Kampe
95 A.D.3d 1005 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Walsh v. Kelly
79 A.D.3d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Castner v. Griffith
226 A.D.2d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Lichtman v. Grossbard
533 N.E.2d 1048 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Shurgin v. Ambach
436 N.E.2d 1324 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie
434 N.E.2d 714 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 N.E.2d 714, 55 N.Y.2d 1019, 449 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mingo-v-pirnie-ny-1982.