MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie
This text of 434 N.E.2d 714 (MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division except insofar as it discusses a right to a hearing because of injury to petitioner’s reputation. Inasmuch as that issue was not raised in the petition, it need not be reached here (cf. Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 NY2d 860).
In addition, we note that the respondents’ determination to disqualify petitioner was neither without factual basis nor was it arbitrary or capricious.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 N.E.2d 714, 55 N.Y.2d 1019, 449 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mingo-v-pirnie-ny-1982.