Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie

MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie

434 N.E.2d 714, 55 N.Y.2d 1019, 449 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3184
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 1982·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division except insofar as it discusses a right to a hearing because of injury to petitioner’s reputation. Inasmuch as that issue was not raised in the petition, it need not be reached here (cf. Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 NY2d 860).

In addition, we note that the respondents’ determination to disqualify petitioner was neither without factual basis nor was it arbitrary or capricious.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie, 434 N.E.2d 714, 55 N.Y.2d 1019, 449 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3184 (N.Y. 1982).

434 N.E.2d 714 (MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attard v. Kampe
95 A.D.3d 1005 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Walsh v. Kelly
79 A.D.3d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Castner v. Griffith
226 A.D.2d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Lichtman v. Grossbard
533 N.E.2d 1048 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Shurgin v. Ambach
436 N.E.2d 1324 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
MATTER OF MINGO v. Pirnie
434 N.E.2d 714 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)