Castner v. Griffith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Castner v. Griffith

226 A.D.2d 1095, 641 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5568

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 A.D.2d 1095 (Castner v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castner v. Griffith, 226 A.D.2d 1095, 641 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition and annulling respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a firefighter. Petitioner provided false information regarding his residence on a number of forms submitted at the time of his appointment. The falsification of information on those documents provided a sufficient ground for petitioner’s termination during the probationary period (see, Matter of Martin v Board of Educ., 215 AD2d 661; Matter of Stewart v Civil Serv. Commn., 84 AD2d 491; Matter of Mingo v Pirnie, 78 AD2d 984, affd 55 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition and annulling respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a firefighter. Petitioner provided false information regarding his residence on a number of forms submitted at the time of his appointment. The falsification of information on those documents provided a sufficient ground for petitioner’s termination during the probationary period (see, Matter of Martin v Board of Educ., 215 AD2d 661; Matter of Stewart v Civil Serv. Commn., 84 AD2d 491; Matter of Mingo v Pirnie, 78 AD2d 984, affd 55 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 1095, 641 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castner-v-griffith-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack