MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace
925 N.E.2d 80, 14 N.Y.3d 743, 899 N.Y.S.2d 748
This text of 925 N.E.2d 80 (MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace, 925 N.E.2d 80, 14 N.Y.3d 743, 899 N.Y.S.2d 748 (N.Y. 2010).
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Pigott and Jones. Judge Smith dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction in an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kachalsky v. County of Westchester
701 F.3d 81 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Kachalsky v. Cacace
817 F. Supp. 2d 235 (S.D. New York, 2011)
MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace
925 N.E.2d 80 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
925 N.E.2d 80, 14 N.Y.3d 743, 899 N.Y.S.2d 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-kachalsky-v-cacace-ny-2010.