MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace
925 N.E.2d 80, 14 N.Y.3d 743, 899 N.Y.S.2d 748
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Pigott and Jones. Judge Smith dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction in an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace, 925 N.E.2d 80, 14 N.Y.3d 743, 899 N.Y.S.2d 748 (N.Y. 2010).
925 N.E.2d 80 (MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kachalsky v. County of Westchester
701 F.3d 81 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Kachalsky v. Cacace
817 F. Supp. 2d 235 (S.D. New York, 2011)
MATTER OF KACHALSKY v. Cacace
925 N.E.2d 80 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)