Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF HOLBROOK v. State Ins. Fund

MATTER OF HOLBROOK v. State Ins. Fund

429 N.E.2d 420, 54 N.Y.2d 892, 444 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3095
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1981·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

On review of the record here, we cannot say that respondents’ termination of petitioner was for “a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription” (James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891, 892). Moreover, the petitioner produced no evidence that the director of administration, the same officer who signed petitioner’s letter of appointment, was not authorized to sign his letter of termination.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF HOLBROOK v. State Ins. Fund, 429 N.E.2d 420, 54 N.Y.2d 892, 444 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3095 (N.Y. 1981).

429 N.E.2d 420 (MATTER OF HOLBROOK v. State Ins. Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyers v. City of New York
208 A.D.2d 258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Kearney v. Coughlin
110 A.D.2d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
MATTER OF BERGAMINI v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth.
467 N.E.2d 521 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Miller v. Ravitch
458 N.E.2d 1235 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Bergamini v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
94 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Matter of Stanziale v. Executive Dep't, Office of Gen. Servs.
431 N.E.2d 635 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)