Matter of City of New York
This text of 462 N.E.2d 140 (Matter of City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 724), to which we add that claimant’s introduction of the determination of the city planning commission with respect to another Victory Boulevard property within one-half mile of the subject parcel that “Analysis of the market area * * * indicates the ability to currently support 160,000 square feet of commercial space, comprised of convenience, service and local shopping space” also tended to establish the economic feasibility of a shopping center use.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 N.E.2d 140, 61 N.Y.2d 843, 473 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-city-of-new-york-ny-1984.