Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nelson)

2017 NY Slip Op 6340, 153 A.D.3d 1126, 57 N.Y.S.3d 915
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 24, 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6340 (Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nelson)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nelson), 2017 NY Slip Op 6340, 153 A.D.3d 1126, 57 N.Y.S.3d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1980 and lists a business address in Cheltenham, Pennsylvania with the Office of Court Administration. This Court suspended respondent from the practice of law in New York in 2009 due to conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice arising from his failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (65 AD3d 1447, 1470 [2009]; see Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]). Respondent moves for his reinstatement (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16 [a]), and petitioner advises, by correspondence from its Chief Attorney, that it does not oppose the motion.

Respondent’s application demonstrates that he has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court. Further, upon reading respondent’s affidavit and the correspondence in response by petitioner’s Chief Attorney, we are satisfied that respondent has the requisite character and fitness for the practice of law, and that it would be in the public’s interest to reinstate him to practice in New York (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stanley], 151 AD3d 1380 [2017]; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 *1127 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for reinstatement is granted, and he is reinstated to the practice of law in New York, effective immediately.

Garry, J.R, Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nelson)
2017 NY Slip Op 6340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 6340, 153 A.D.3d 1126, 57 N.Y.S.3d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-nelson-nyappdiv-2017.