In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

65 A.D.3d 1447, 885 N.Y.S.2d 441
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 2009·Published·Cited by 152 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner moves to suspend respondent attorneys on the ground that they have failed to file a registration statement and pay the required attorney registration fee in accordance with Judiciary Law § 468-a and part 118 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR part 118).

The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. They have also failed to respond to the instant motion.

Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with [1448] the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and shall be referred to the appropriate appellate division ... for disciplinary action.” This Court has previously held that failure to comply with the registration requirements is professional misconduct warranting discipline (see e.g. Matter of Arms, 251 AD2d 743 [1998]; Matter of Ryan, 238 AD2d 713 [1997]; Matter of Farley, 205 AD2d 874 [1994]).

In view of respondents’ continued failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of the Judiciary Law and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts, petitioner’s motion is granted and the respondents listed on the schedule attached hereto are suspended, effective 30 days from the date of this order, until further order of this Court (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 44 AD3d 1246 [2007]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Feters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that the respondents listed on the schedule attached hereto are suspended, effective 30 days from the date of this order, until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondents are commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondents are hereby forbidden to appear as attorneys or counselors-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondents shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9); and it is further ordered that this decision and order may be served upon respondents by publication thereof in the New York Law Journal once each week for four consecutive weeks, the publication to commence within 20 days of the date of this decision and order, and by posting same on the Web site maintained by this Court for a period of 30 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 65 A.D.3d 1447, 885 N.Y.S.2d 441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

65 A.D.3d 1447 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law ? 468-a (Wilson)
2025 NY Slip Op 05286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law ? 468-a (Naito)
2025 NY Slip Op 00263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Chin Cheung)
2024 NY Slip Op 04292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Mariner
216 N.Y.S.3d 318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Notis)
2024 NY Slip Op 03920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Pimentel)
2024 NY Slip Op 01234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Donahue)
2024 NY Slip Op 01235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Escano
221 A.D.3d 1127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
2023 NY Slip Op 05028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Reis)
2023 NY Slip Op 03969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)
2023 NY Slip Op 02373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Zaurdo
184 N.Y.S.3d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Ostuni
213 A.D.3d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Gang)
2022 NY Slip Op 07491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kern)
2022 NY Slip Op 07128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Policastro)
2022 NY Slip Op 06532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Colston)
2021 NY Slip Op 06140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Higashi)
2018 NY Slip Op 1983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Timourian)
2017 NY Slip Op 6593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)