Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)

2023 NY Slip Op 02373
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 2023·No. PM-97-23·Published

Opinion

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee) (2023 NY Slip Op 02373)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)
2023 NY Slip Op 02373
Decided on May 4, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:May 4, 2023

PM-97-23

[*1]In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Now Known as Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; David Gene Lee, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2682326.)


Calendar Date:January 23, 2023
Before:

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

David Gene Lee, Seattle, Washington, respondent pro se.



Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2009 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 65 AD3d 1447, 1465 [3d Dept 2009]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16). Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to December 19, 2022 and the January 19, 2023 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Andison], 211 AD3d 1307, 1308 [3d Dept 2022]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Pritzker, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee), 2023 NY Slip Op 02373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

2023 NY Slip Op 02373 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
65 A.D.3d 1447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)