Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)

2023 NY Slip Op 02931
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 2023·No. PM-115-23·Published

Opinion

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee) (2023 NY Slip Op 02931)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)
2023 NY Slip Op 02931
Decided on June 1, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:June 1, 2023

PM-115-23

[*1]In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Jung Sun Lee, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5301718.)


Calendar Date:March 20, 2023
Before:Garry, P.J., Clark, Pritzker, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Jung Sun Lee, Seoul, South Korea, respondent pro se.



Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by October 2021 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 198 AD3d 1068, 1080 [3d Dept 2021]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit sworn to January 31, 2023 with exhibits and the March 16, 2023 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Lefkowitz], 213 AD3d 1072, 1074-1075 [3d Dept 2023]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Clark, Pritzker, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee), 2023 NY Slip Op 02931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

2023 NY Slip Op 02931 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lefkowitz)
213 A.D.3d 1072 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)