Mathis v. State

681 So. 2d 1215, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11409, 1996 WL 631701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mathis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 682 So. 2d 175
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1996·No. No. 95-2987·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Torrance Mathis appeals the final judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of strong arm robbery, fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer, and driving with a suspended license. Mathis elected to represent himself, and after conducting a Faretta1 hearing, the trial court allowed him to do so. We affirm the convictions but reverse and remand for resentencing because the court neglected to renew the offer of counsel at the time of sentencing. See Hardy v. State, 655 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), rev. denied, 667 So.2d 774 (Fla.1996); see also Parker v. State, 539 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; SENTENCES REVERSED; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathis v. State, 681 So. 2d 1215, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11409, 1996 WL 631701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

681 So. 2d 1215 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Parker v. State
539 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Hardy v. State
655 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)