Mastrocola v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
973 A.2d 412, 601 Pa. 383, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1045
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 1, 2009·No. Petition Nos. 103 & 104 EAL 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[384]*384 ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:
1. Is federal preemption based upon choice-of-law preemption a waivable defense?
2. Are Petitioners’ claims in this suit preempted, or are they preserved from preemption by the clarifying amendment to FRSA at 49 U.S.C. § 20106(b)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mastrocola v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 973 A.2d 412, 601 Pa. 383, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1045 (Pa. 2009).
973 A.2d 412 (Mastrocola v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
65 A.3d 1006 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)