FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL
Preemption
49 U.S.C. § 20106
Title49 — Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 20106 (Preemption) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 20106.
Text
(a)National Uniformity of Regulation.—
(1)Laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad safety and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security shall be nationally uniform to the extent practicable.
(2)A State may adopt or continue in force a law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security until the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters), prescribes a regulation or issues an order covering the subject matter of the State requirement. A State may adopt or continue in force an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security when the law, regulation, or order—
(A)is necessary to eliminate or reduce
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Law v. General Motors Corp.
114 F.3d 908 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
People v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
209 Cal. App. 4th 1513 (California Court of Appeal, 2012)
City of Weyauwega v. Wis. Cent. Ltd.
2018 WI App 65 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2018)
Drake v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings
458 F.3d 48 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Union Pacific Railroad v. California Public Utilities Commission
346 F.3d 851 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
State v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Corp.
546 N.W.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1996)
Shanklin v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
173 F.3d 386 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
Fair v. BNSF Railway
(California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Kehrer v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
(S.D. Illinois, 2024)
Travis Hendrix v. Port Terminal Railroad Association
(Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
BNSF Railway Company v. Lori Swanson
(Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Tom Lundeen v. Canadian Pacific Railway Compa
(Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Opinion Number
(Louisiana Attorney General Reports, 1996)
Opinion No.
(Texas Attorney General Reports, 2005)
Rowell v. BNSF Railway Company
(E.D. Arkansas, 2019)
Immel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
(D. Colorado, 2019)
Storey v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
(D. Colorado, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 866; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1710(c), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2319; Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1528, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 453.)
Editorial Notes
In this section, before clause (1), the words "The Congress declares that" are omitted as unnecessary. In clause (3), the word "unreasonably" is substituted for "undue" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2007—Pub. L. 110–53 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text of section read as follows: "Laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad safety and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security shall be nationally uniform to the extent practicable. A State may adopt or continue in force a law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security until the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters), prescribes a regulation or issues an order covering the subject matter of the State requirement. A State may adopt or continue in force an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security when the law, regulation, or order—
"(1) is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard;
"(2) is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and
"(3) does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce."
2002—Pub. L. 107–296, §1710(c), in introductory provisions, in first sentence inserted "and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security" after "safety", in second sentence substituted "Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters)," for "Transportation", and in second and third sentences inserted "or security" after "order related to railroad safety".
Par. (1). Pub. L. 107–296, §1710(c)(2), inserted "or security" after "safety".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2007—Pub. L. 110–53 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text of section read as follows: "Laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad safety and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security shall be nationally uniform to the extent practicable. A State may adopt or continue in force a law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security until the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters), prescribes a regulation or issues an order covering the subject matter of the State requirement. A State may adopt or continue in force an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security when the law, regulation, or order—
"(1) is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard;
"(2) is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and
"(3) does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce."
2002—Pub. L. 107–296, §1710(c), in introductory provisions, in first sentence inserted "and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security" after "safety", in second sentence substituted "Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters)," for "Transportation", and in second and third sentences inserted "or security" after "order related to railroad safety".
Par. (1). Pub. L. 107–296, §1710(c)(2), inserted "or security" after "safety".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 20106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/20106.