FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Preemption

49 U.S.C. § 20106
Title49Transportation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

This text of 49 U.S.C. § 20106 (Preemption) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 20106.

Text

(a)National Uniformity of Regulation.—
(1)Laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad safety and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security shall be nationally uniform to the extent practicable.
(2)A State may adopt or continue in force a law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security until the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters), prescribes a regulation or issues an order covering the subject matter of the State requirement. A State may adopt or continue in force an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security when the law, regulation, or order—
(A)is necessary to eliminate or reduce

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Law v. General Motors Corp.
114 F.3d 908 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
42 case citations
People v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
209 Cal. App. 4th 1513 (California Court of Appeal, 2012)
16 case citations
City of Weyauwega v. Wis. Cent. Ltd.
2018 WI App 65 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2018)
13 case citations
Drake v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings
458 F.3d 48 (Second Circuit, 2006)
4 case citations
Union Pacific Railroad v. California Public Utilities Commission
346 F.3d 851 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
2 case citations
State v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Corp.
546 N.W.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1996)
2 case citations
Shanklin v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
173 F.3d 386 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
1 case citations
Fair v. BNSF Railway
(California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Opinion Number
(Louisiana Attorney General Reports, 1996)
Opinion No.
(Texas Attorney General Reports, 2005)
Rowell v. BNSF Railway Company
(E.D. Arkansas, 2019)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 866; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1710(c), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2319; Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, §1528, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 453.)

Editorial Notes

In this section, before clause (1), the words "The Congress declares that" are omitted as unnecessary. In clause (3), the word "unreasonably" is substituted for "undue" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2007—Pub. L. 110–53 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text of section read as follows: "Laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad safety and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security shall be nationally uniform to the extent practicable. A State may adopt or continue in force a law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security until the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters), prescribes a regulation or issues an order covering the subject matter of the State requirement. A State may adopt or continue in force an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security when the law, regulation, or order—
"(1) is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard;
"(2) is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and
"(3) does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce."
2002—Pub. L. 107–296, §1710(c), in introductory provisions, in first sentence inserted "and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security" after "safety", in second sentence substituted "Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters)," for "Transportation", and in second and third sentences inserted "or security" after "order related to railroad safety".
Par. (1). Pub. L. 107–296, §1710(c)(2), inserted "or security" after "safety".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 20106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/20106.