MASTROCOLA v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

973 A.2d 412
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 1, 2009
Docket103 & 104 EAL 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 973 A.2d 412 (MASTROCOLA v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MASTROCOLA v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 973 A.2d 412 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

*413 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:

1. Is federal preemption based upon choice-of-law preemption a waivable defense?

2. Are Petitioners’ claims in this suit preempted, or are they preserved from preemption by the clarifying amendment to FRSA at 49 U.S.C. § 20106(b)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
65 A.3d 1006 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
973 A.2d 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastrocola-v-southeastern-pennsylvania-transportation-authority-pa-2009.