MASTROCOLA v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

MASTROCOLA v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

973 A.2d 412

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 1, 2009·No. 103 & 104 EAL 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*413 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:

1. Is federal preemption based upon choice-of-law preemption a waivable defense?

2. Are Petitioners’ claims in this suit preempted, or are they preserved from preemption by the clarifying amendment to FRSA at 49 U.S.C. § 20106(b)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*413 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:

1. Is federal preemption based upon choice-of-law preemption a waivable defense?

2. Are Petitioners’ claims in this suit preempted, or are they preserved from preemption by the clarifying amendment to FRSA at 49 U.S.C. § 20106(b)?

MASTROCOLA v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 973 A.2d 412 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 412 (MASTROCOLA v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related