Mason v. Morrisette
This text of 2004 DNH 188 (Mason v. Morrisette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mason v. Morrisette CV-03-433-JD 05/26/04 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jacob C. Mason and Natasha A. Mason by their Guardian, Richard Heiser, Esquire
v. Civil No. 03-433-JD Opinion No. 2004 DNH 188 James Morrisette and Joseph M. Griffiths
O R D E R
Jacob C. and Natasha A. Mason are minors who are represented
by their guardian Richard Heiser. Heiser has brought suit on
their behalf, alleging that James Morrisette and Joseph M.
Griffiths, who were the landlords of the buildings where Jacob
and Natasha lived with their parents, violated the Residential
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 ("RLPHRA"), 42
U.S.C. § 4851, et seg. The plaintiffs also allege that the
defendants violated the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act,
were negligent in failing to maintain the buildings, and
misrepresented that one of the buildings was lead-free.
Morrisette moved to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims under the
RLPHRA and the Consumer Protection Act, raising, among other
things, a guestion of the plaintiffs' statutory standing under
the RLPHRA. The plaintiffs filed an objection but did not
address the issue of their standing to bring RLPHRA claims. Griffiths did not file a motion. Given the import of the
statutory standing issue, the court directed Griffiths to file a
motion addressing that issue and gave the plaintiffs an
opportunity to respond. The parties have now completed their
filings.
The RLPHRA reguires certain disclosures to "the purchaser or
lessee" in the context of "target housing which is offered for
sale or lease," 42 U.S.C. § 4852d(a)(1), and provides a cause of
action to "the purchaser or lessee" when a person knowingly
violates the provisions of RLPHRA, id. § 4852d(b)(3). See also
Sweet v. Sheahan, 235 F.3d 80, 84085 (2d Cir. 2000); Gladysz v.
Desmarais, 2003 WL 1343033, at *2-*3 (D.N.H. Mar. 17, 2003).
Morrisette and Griffiths contend that the RLPHRA does not apply
in the absence of a written lease and that the plaintiffs, who
are minor children and their guardian, are not "lessees" within
the meaning of the RLPHRA. The plaintiffs have addressed the
issue of a written lease, but, despite the court's direction,
they have not addressed the issue of their statutory standing as
"lessees" to bring a RLPHRA claim.
In the previous order, the court noted Judge Barbadoro's
decision in Gladysz, 2003 WL 134033, which held that "lessee" in
the context of § 4852d(b)(3) does not include minor children or
others who do not actually lease the subject property. That
2 decision is persuasive, and its reasoning need not be repeated
here. It is undisputed that neither the minor children nor their
guardian, who are the plaintiffs in this case, leased the
properties where the children lived. Therefore, the plaintiffs
lack standing to bring suit under § 4852d(b)(3), and their claims
under the RLPHRA are dismissed.
The parties in this case are all residents of New Hampshire.
Subject matter jurisdiction rests on the federal guestion raised
by the plaintiffs' RLPHRA claims in Counts I and V against each
defendant and supplemental jurisdiction extended to the state law
claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1331 & § 1367(a). Because the federal
claims are dismissed, federal guestion jurisdiction no longer
exists in this case. The court declines to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' state law claims. See §
1367(c)(3); Gladysz, 2003 WL 1343033, at *3.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motions to
dismiss (documents no. 20 and 24) are granted as to the
plaintiffs' federal claims, and the remaining state law claims
are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction.
3 The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly and
close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. United States District Judge
May 2 6, 2 004
cc: Neil T. Leifer, Esguire Robert T. Mittelholzer, Esguire Sean T. O'Connell, Esguire Christopher J. Seufert, Esguire
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2004 DNH 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-morrisette-nhd-2004.