Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Martin v. State

Martin v. State

464 S.W.3d 280, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 703, 2015 WL 3972371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1443 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2015·No. WD 77516·Published

Opinion

[281]*281ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. Phillip D. Martin appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. He claims' that he was forced to plead guilty to the charged offenses because defense counsel failed to prepare for trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 464 S.W.3d 280, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 703, 2015 WL 3972371 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

464 S.W.3d 280 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.