Martin v. State

386 S.W.3d 915, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1571, 2012 WL 6115621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1443
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 11, 2012·No. No. WD 74021·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. David John Martin appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He contends he received ineffective assistance of plea counsel and sentencing counsel.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 386 S.W.3d 915, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1571, 2012 WL 6115621 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

386 S.W.3d 915 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.